Rfc5224
TitleDiameter Policy Processing Application
AuthorM. Brenner
DateMarch 2008
Format:TXT, HTML
Status:INFORMATIONAL






Network Working Group                                         M. Brenner
Request for Comments: 5224                                Alcatel-Lucent
Category: Informational                                       March 2008


                 Diameter Policy Processing Application

Status of This Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

Abstract

   This document describes the need for a new IANA Diameter Command Code
   to be used in a vendor-specific new application for invocation of
   Policy Processing (Policy Evaluation, or Evaluation and Enforcement).
   This application is needed as one of the implementations of the Open
   Mobile Alliance (OMA) Policy Evaluation, Enforcement and Management
   (PEEM) enabler, namely for the PEM-1 interface used to send a
   request/response for Policy Processing.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
   3.  Diameter Policy Processing Application  . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     5.1.  Command Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     5.2.  AVP Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     5.3.  Application Identifier  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   6.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4














RFC 5224                          PEEM                        March 2008


1.  Introduction

   This document summarizes the use of Diameter codes in a newly defined
   realization of a specification for invocation of policy processing.
   A new Command Code has been assigned by IANA.  The document
   summarizes the uses of newly defined Diameter codes (a Command Code,
   an AVP, and a vendor-specific application id).  When combined with
   the Diameter Base protocol, this application's specification
   satisfies the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) Policy Evaluation,
   Enforcement, and Management (PEEM) requirements for sending a request
   for policy processing and receiving a response with the policy
   processing result.  See [PEM-1-TS] for the normative use of Diameter.
   PEEM requirements are documented in [PEEM-RD] and PEEM Architecture
   is documented in [PEEM-AD].

   The Diameter realization of this application assumes the use of the
   Diameter Base protocol, as per RFC 3588, and extends it only for a
   specific application using a vendor-id (PEN), a vendor-specific
   application ID, a new Command Code (314), and a new AVP defined in
   the vendor-specific namespace.  Input to policy processing are being
   passed through a new AVP, and policy results are being passed through
   a combination of the same new AVP, and the Experimental-Result AVP.

2.  Terminology

   The base Diameter specification (Section 1.4 of [RFC3588]) defines
   most of the terminology used in this document.  Additionally, the
   terms and acronyms defined in [PEM-1-TS] are used in this document.


3.  Diameter Policy Processing Application

   A detailed description of the Diameter Policy Processing Application
   can be found in Section 5.4.1 of the Policy Evaluation, Enforcement
   and Management Callable Interface (PEM-1) Technical Specification
   [PEM-1-TS].

4.  Security Considerations

   This document describes the Diameter Policy Processing Application.
   It builds on top of the Diameter Base protocol and the same security
   considerations described in RFC 3588 [RFC3588] are applicable to this
   document.  No further extensions are required beyond the security
   mechanisms offered by RFC 3588.







RFC 5224                          PEEM                        March 2008


5.  IANA Considerations

   This section provides guidance to the Internet Assigned Numbers
   Authority (IANA) regarding registration of values related to the
   Diameter protocol, in accordance with BCP 26 [RFC2434].

   This document defines values in the namespaces that have been created
   and defined in the Diameter Base [RFC3588].  The IANA Considerations
   section of that document details the assignment criteria.  Values
   assigned in this document, or by future IANA action, must be
   coordinated within this shared namespace.

5.1.  Command Codes

   This specification assigns the value 314 from the Command Code
   namespace defined in [RFC3588].  See Section 5.4.1.3.1 of [PEM-1-TS]
   to see how the command code is used.

   IANA has made the following assignment in the "Authentication,
   Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) Parameters" registry, in the sub-
   registry "Command Codes".

   Code Value          Name                            Reference
   --------------      ------------------------------- ---------
   314                 PDR / PDA                       [RFC5224]

5.2.  AVP Codes

   This specification uses the value 1 for the Policy-Data AVP, in the
   OMA Vendor-ID (PEN) AVP namespace.  See Section 5.4.1.3.3 of
   [PEM-1-TS] for the assignment of the namespace in this specification.

5.3.  Application Identifier

   This specification uses the value 16777243 in the Application
   Identifier namespace as registered in IANA for the Policy Processing
   Application.  See Section 5.4.1.3 of [PEM-1-TS] for more information.

6.  Acknowledgements

   The author would like to thank Dan Romascanu and Hannes Tschofenig
   for their help and support.

   Finally, the author would like to thank Alcatel-Lucent, as most of
   the effort put into this document was done while he was in their
   employ.





RFC 5224                          PEEM                        March 2008


7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [PEM-1-TS]  Open Mobile Alliance, "Policy Evaluation, Enforcement and
               Management Callable Interface (PEM-1) Technical
               Specification, Draft Version 1.0, available at http://
               www.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/ARCH/
               Permanent_documents/
               OMA-TS-PEEM_PEM1-V1_0-20080325-D.zip", December 2007.

   [RFC3588]   Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J.
               Arkko, "Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 3588,
               September 2003.

7.2.  Informative References

   [PEEM-AD]   Open Mobile Alliance, "Policy Evaluation, Enforcement and
               Management Architecture, Draft Version 1.0, available at
               http://www.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/
               ARCH/Permanent_documents/
               OMA-AD-Policy_Evaluation_Enforcement_Management-V1_0_0-
               20060625-D.zip", June 2006.

   [PEEM-RD]   Open Mobile Alliance, "Policy Evaluation, Enforcement and
               Management Requirements, Candidate Version 1.0, 12
               January 2005, available at http://
               www.openmobilealliance.org/ftp/Public_documents/ARCH/
               permanent_documents/
               OMA-RD-Policy_Evaluation_Enforcement_Management-V1_0-
               20050112-C.zip", November 2005.

   [RFC2434]   Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
               IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
               October 1998.

Author's Address

   Michael Brenner
   Alcatel-Lucent
   600-700 Mountain Avenue, 2D-148
   Murray Hill, NJ  07974-0636
   USA

   Phone: +1 908-582-8753
   EMail: mrbrenner@alcatel-lucent.com





RFC 5224                          PEEM                        March 2008


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at
   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.